Capricorn one oj simpson knife6/26/2023 ![]() ![]() That is the crucial element of the film, not the hoax itself. It involves too many uncontrollable factors and unpredictable outcomes for any agency to get away it.Īt the end of Capricorn One, the hoax is exposed. Yes, the government might be corrupt enough to plan something like this, but they could never get away with it because too many good and honest people (like Elliott Gould) would expose it. They were planting this idea in the heads of those watching the film: No, they were taking an idea which they knew was already in the head of the nation and trying to turn it subtly away from its target. They weren’t confirming the Moon landing was a hoax, of course. The movie was conceived of and promoted by the government itself. Why did NASA cooperate with Capricorn One? Damage control. He probably fooled you.īefore we move on, let me answer my own question. Remember what the assistant district attorney in the Manson trial said about Susan Atkins: “She’s better than Sarah Bernhardt.” Well, Simpson wasn’t better than Lawrence Olivier, but he did his job. All the people in the Tate/Manson event were actors. The CIA hires pros just like anyone else would. They were hired to fill a role, as in their other jobs. Keep reminding yourself that all these people are actors. When you finish this paper, you can take another look at Robert Blake as well. I’ve said many times: some people have AFI Lifetime Achievement awards some people have multiple Oscars my bit of trivia is that I’ve made films with two leading men who were subsequently tried for the first degree murder of their wives.Īnother strange coincidence, right? Nope. OJ Simpson was in it, and Robert Blake was in (Hyams’ first feature) Busting. Even weirder is what director Peter Hyams later said about Capricorn One: Why would they do that? We are told the movie was independent, but it was distributed by Warner Brothers and produced by ITC and Paul Lazarus. One, NASA cooperated with the producers, lending them equipment. But there are curious things rarely mentioned about the movie. Audiences loved it, since after Watergate they liked any confirmation they were being lied to by the government. ![]() The movie was based on theories the Moon landing was a hoax. Simpson also appeared in the 1978 movie Capricorn One, which is about faking a Mars landing. This paper is just a continuation of those, and can’t be fully appreciated without them. If you don’t believe that, I suggest you read my other recent papers before getting any further into this one, including the papers on Manson, the Zodiac, the Unabomber, Watergate, Johnny Hovey, Lennon, Lincoln, Walt Whitman, the Beat poets, and Hemingway. It does whatever it wants, including faking murders and faking trials. Lex means law in Latin, and Intelligence sees itself as A LAW unto itself. But the reason Intelligence likes the word is easy to see if you write it like this: Alexa is now used as the basis for web searches as well as for the Wayback Machine, which has stored terabytes of information. Remember, the web was originally created by Intelligence as a tool of Intelligence, both to collect data and to disseminate it. The right answer is that the CIA has long liked and used the name Alexa, and that the computer company of that name is a CIA front. And neither is the word “Alexa.” A web search on Alexa tells you the name means “defender of man,” or that the computer company Alexa founded in 1996 based the name on the Library of Alexandria. Just another coincidence, right? Not really, as you will see. In 1993, Simpson had a supporting role in a movie called CIA, codename Alexa. Consult my paper on the Manson murders for more on that: I won’t cover all that evidence again here. ![]() Who runs Hollywood? That’s right, our old friend the CIA. After his famous career as a football running back, Simpson went to Hollywood to become an actor. This early in the investigation, you will no doubt dismiss that as a coincidence. What else was born in 1947? That’s right, our old friend the CIA. Here we will ignore the circus and just look at the facts.We will start at the very beginning. You couldn’t see them or hear them in the smoke and din. I will show that you missed them because they were surrounded with noise and flashing lights. I will circle and highlight the things you may have missed the first thousand times. I no longer have any use for it.Instead of looking at this event through the eyes of the controlled media, here you will be forced to look at it through the eyes of a real investigator. On the other hand, if you prefer the mainstream story, feel free to keep it. If they jog something in your head, great. As I have done with the other events I have recently unwound for you, I will present you with the clues you may have missed so far.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |